We will outline some recent developments that have brought Marineland’s harmful practices to light and how you can help.
Seaspiracy: The Netflix documentary challenging the notion of “sustainable seafood”
The controversial new Netflix documentary, Seaspiracy, takes viewers on filmmaker Ali Tabrizi’s quest to understand the harm being done to our oceans, and what the real causes of this damage are. Tabrizi quickly learns that the greatest threat to marine life is, in fact, commercial fishing. Whether large scale fishing could ever be done “sustainably” is doubtful, and in any event it is far more ethical to eat a plant-based diet.
An overview of what was and was not found in a new study on diet and the severity of COVID-19 infection. Plant-forward eating is associated with better outcomes.
Fully plant-based diets are the most efficient and, thus, the most sustainable – by tremendous margins. We can all make changes today to move in the right direction.
The use of misinformation by plant-based advocates is damaging and undermines our collective goals. The facts are on our side. Follow our tips for using an evidence-based approach in your advocacy.
Many vegan public figures have been using their platforms in significant ways to promote vegan principles. Here’s a quick look at the amazing contributions of some plant-based celebrities.
With the exploding popularity of plant-based products, we are set to see a dramatic transformation of our cultural relationship to animal-based foods. These changes will remove many of the social barriers some would-be vegans face, allowing them to act in accordance with their values without being stigmatized or excluded.
Our Voice for Change is championing and spreading awareness of animal-free dissection in BC Schools. They won $5000 in the Kelowna Sustainable Development Challenge to see their project tested in schools.
I’m admittedly a fan of vegan fast food every now and then, so I wanted to share my thoughts on some of the new vegan options I’ve tried recently.
People often demonstrate an understanding that eating animals is unethical and unsustainable, but choose to do so, giving various reasons to rationalize this decision. This is an example of cognitive dissonance, the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs. In many cases of those who eat meat, the conflicting beliefs are “I love and care for animals” and “I eat meat”. This version of cognitive dissonance is often referred to as the “meat paradox” – in short, I don’t want to harm animals, but I eat animals.
Recent Posts
- United Nations Environment Program: The World is In Grave Danger – But We Can Save It … and Thrive!
- 2025 State of the Climate Report: A dire reality that we CAN turn around!
- COP 30: The impacts of animal agriculture on the climate
- Meat industry influence may lead to biased conclusions in nutrition studies
Engage with us on facebook
"The analysis shows these options have equivalent global climate benefits: Reduce flying 70% = Replace 17% of fossil cars with electric vehicles = Replace 73%
Facts: A garden of climate solutions 🌱 🚴♀️| Feelings: Grounded by Climate Wayfinding 👣🧘| Action: Build a coalition of the willing 🫱🏽🫲🏾💪🏼
"British supermarkets could stand to gain billions, make progress on their climate targets, and address the country’s fibre deficiency by championing plant-based proteins, shows a
UK Supermarkets Could Earn Billions By Investing in Plant-Based Proteins: Report
Private-label brands make up 82% of processed meat sales in the UK, but only 15% of plant-based alternatives. Retailers could lose out on billions without protein diversification.

