• Why Plant-Based?
    • Overview
    • Sustainability
    • Better health
    • Compassion for animals
  • Resources
    • Virtual speaker series
    • Speakers program
    • Pamphlets
    • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Contact us
  • How to Help
    • Join us
    • Donate
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
Earthsave CanadaEarthsave Canada
  • Why Plant-Based?
    • Overview
    • Sustainability
    • Better health
    • Compassion for animals
  • Resources
    • Virtual speaker series
    • Speakers program
    • Pamphlets
    • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Contact us
  • How to Help
    • Join us
    • Donate
  • Subscribe to Newsletter

A Tale of Two Santa Martas

A Tale of Two Santa Martas

A Tale of Two Santa Martas

May 16, 2026 Posted by David Steele

It’s a tale of two documents, emerging from the parallel conferences held in the same city. One closely reflects the reality of the crises we face; the other is more typical, reflecting big business influence on governments, downplaying the urgency of the emergency and ignoring important facets of it.

From April 24th through 29th, the First Conference on the Transition Away from Fossil Fuels was held in Santa Marta, Colombia (1). Organized by the Colombian and Dutch governments, with 57 countries participating, the conference’s aim was to speed the move away from fossil fuels and towards a stable climate.

In the end, it set up ‘workstreams’ to create roadmaps for national and regional fossil fuel phase outs. A vision of a new ‘global climate democracy’ was laid out. Almost no concrete actions were proposed.  Animal agriculture, the other major contributor to global warming, was barely mentioned.

The declaration is weak; it’s far from commensurate with the scale of the ecological crises we face.

In contrast, the parallel Santa Marta People’s Summit Declaration (2) is far stronger. It calls for a truly rapid transition to renewable energy – and it goes much further.

The People’s Declaration highlights the massive role of animal agriculture in global warming, further noting that the “sector actively destabilizes the very hydrological cycles and food systems vulnerable communities rely upon.”

It explicitly states that “the transition is incomplete without transforming global agriculture and agro-industrial food systems which includes industrial animal husbandry, which are a major driver of fossil fuel dependence and greenhouse gas emissions. … By shifting toward localized, animal-free ecofarming models, we can secure food sovereignty, promote youth-oriented agricultural initiatives, and create dignified rural livelihoods.”

They’re right. Let’s listen! Let’s live our lives enjoying the enormous diversity plant-based foods offer, and inspire those around us to do the same. And lets work as hard as we can to convince our governments to act on the People’s Declaration’s call.

  1. https://www.government.nl/latest/news/2026/04/29/transitioning-away-from-fossil-fuels-conference-concludes-with-5-key-deliverables
  2. https://fossilfreerising.org/declaration
Share
Avatar photo

About David Steele

David is a molecular biologist retired in 2013 from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia. He has also held faculty positions at Cornell and Queen’s Universities. Dr. Steele is a frequent public speaker and a regular contributor to Earthsave Canada's publications. He is also an occasional contributor to various other publications.

You also might be interested in

Frankenstein’s monster- early vegetarian celebrity?

Frankenstein’s monster- early vegetarian celebrity?

Nov 18, 2020

Shelley also wrote about how a vegetarian diet is better for the environment, noting: "the quantity of nutritious vegetable matter, consumed in fattening the carcase of an ox, would afford ten times the sustenance if gathered immediately from the bosom of the earth.”6 It is interesting to see how, despite being so long ago, Shelley touches on many of the modern arguments for a vegan diet.

Why you need to show support for Bill C-246

Why you need to show support for Bill C-246

May 18, 2016

Guest post by Lesley Fox, E.D. Our friends at Fur-Bearer[...]

Hunting is nothing like a sustainable food choice

Hunting is nothing like a sustainable food choice

Nov 30, 2021

Some people argue that hunting is more sustainable than animal farming. In reality, neither is a feasible way to feed humans in even the medium-term future.

Donate

Recent Posts

  • A Critical Look at the WRI’s Recent GHG Source Assessment
  • Beyond the protein myths: why plant-based protein deserves a place on your plate
  • A Tale of Two Santa Martas
  • United Nations Environment Program: The World is In Grave Danger – But We Can Save It … and Thrive!

Follow us

Engage with us on facebook

Earthsave Canada

Earthsave Canada

10 hours 18 minutes ago

"De Waal argued that brain size is an insufficient proxy for intelligence, and that “the sentience and moral status of animals is a given,” a

1
View on Facebook
Share

Earthsave Canada

12 hours 25 minutes ago

Like animal agriculture, widespread use of biofuels is wreaking environmental destruction at enormous scales and stealing food from the poor.

The biofuel comeback: more fuel, less food, more land grabs

Biofuels are back, and so are their impacts: land grabbing, rights violations and climate breakdown. As Asian governments ramp up production, Trump uses tariff threats to push them to import US biofuels. Who profits, and who pays the price?

2
View on Facebook
Share
Earthsave Canada

Earthsave Canada

15 hours 10 minutes ago

"When Transport for London (TFL) in the UK removed junk food advertising from its network, weekly household purchases were estimated to fall by nearly seven

2
View on Facebook
Share

© 2026 · Earthsave Canada.