• Why Plant-Based?
    • Overview
    • Sustainability
    • Better health
    • Compassion for animals
  • Resources
    • Virtual speaker series
    • Speakers program
    • Pamphlets
    • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Contact us
  • How to Help
    • Join us
    • Donate
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
Earthsave CanadaEarthsave Canada
  • Why Plant-Based?
    • Overview
    • Sustainability
    • Better health
    • Compassion for animals
  • Resources
    • Virtual speaker series
    • Speakers program
    • Pamphlets
    • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Contact us
  • How to Help
    • Join us
    • Donate
  • Subscribe to Newsletter

We’ve outgrown omnivorism

We’ve outgrown omnivorism

We’ve outgrown omnivorism

May 10, 2016 Posted by David Steele

By David Steele and Denise Swanson

Many question whether humans are ‘naturally’ herbivores or omnivores. The omnivore camp argues that our species evolved to eat both plantsand animals. Many others agree with Mahatma Gandhi that no, humansare natural herbivores.

This time, Gandhi was wrong.

Humans evolved eating a mix of plant and animal materials. The structure of our guts and the transporters therein and the arrangementand shapes of our teeth – not to mention the wealth of fossil evidence(arrowheads, butchered animal bones, etc.) going back literally millionsof years – all point to an omnivorous past.

Natural selection favored meat eating because it allowed our ancestorsto survive in the absence of reliable supplies of edible plants. Ourhunter-gatherer forebears could flourish on fruits and berries whenthose were plentiful and switch to meat when edible plants were scarce. Had early humans not led omnivorous lives, they almost certainlywould have died out.

Yet we have continued to evolve since then. Just 10,000 years ago, isolated bands of humans invented agriculture. Around the world, we began to grow crops and domesticate animals, which, for the most part, we raised to convert grasses to meat for us. Sometime later, a mutation arose in us and we could add animal milk to our adult diets as well. And for a very long time, we have flourished.

But things have changed.

In the past, humans were few and far between. The pressure we exerted on the creatures around us was slight. In contrast, with a population of about 7 billion people – headed towards 10 billion by mid-century – the pressures we exert today are enormous. Whereas meat eating allowed humanity to survive the harsh environments of the past, doing so is now well on the way to making the environment itself uninhabitable. It is no exaggeration to state that our hunger for meat is destroying the world.

In 2005, some 55 billion farm animals were killed for food. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, worldwide meat consumption, ignoring fish, increased from 156 billion pounds in 1961 to 540 billion pounds in 2002. World population doubled and meat consumption increased nearly 4-fold.

The New York Times has reported on just how destructive this accelerating production of animal products can be. As China switches from a largely soy-based diet to meat, paradoxically their demand for soy is skyrocketing. In today’s factory farms, it takes 2.4 lbs of corn, soy and oats to produce a pound of chicken, 8-10 lbs of similar feed is required for every pound of beef. Chinese demand for meat has led to a doubling of Brazilian soy exports – at a cost of huge swaths of the Amazon rainforest.

Meat production pollutes enormously. The Union of Concerned Scientists has shown that animal agriculture is second only to transportation in the pollution it causes. Twenty tons of manure is produced for every household in the United States.

And meat production accelerates global warming. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, animal agriculture is the number one worldwide source of global warming gases. More than transportation, more than electrical generation.

Natural selection operates on the here and now. In the past, the ability to eat meat was a boon to us. But today, the opposite is true. If we don’t dramatically curtail our consumption of animal products, our planet will become a wasteland; natural selection will soon select in the strongest way against our meat-eating habits.

We’re lucky. We evolved as omnivores. We can choose what we eat. Plants or animals. Choose plants.

The survival of not only our species but of much of the planet is at stake.


Photo by Diana Polekhina on Unsplash

Share
Avatar photo

About David Steele

David is a molecular biologist retired in 2013 from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia. He has also held faculty positions at Cornell and Queen’s Universities. Dr. Steele is a frequent public speaker and a regular contributor to Earthsave Canada's publications. He is also an occasional contributor to various other publications.

You also might be interested in

The case for veganism is a slam dunk

The case for veganism is a slam dunk

Sep 14, 2020

Being vegan helps prevent the suffering of innocent animals, slows[...]

Recent report confirms Canadians should adopt a plant-based diet to achieve a “1.5-Degree Lifestyle”

Recent report confirms Canadians should adopt a plant-based diet to achieve a “1.5-Degree Lifestyle”

Jun 19, 2023

A 2021 report entitled 1.5-Degree Lifestyles investigated GHG emission and lifestyle patterns in ten countries, including Canada, to identify what life might look like in 2030 to avoid warming over 1.5C by 2050. The results confirm that the shift to plant-based diets can have enormous impacts.

The problem with palm oil

May 2, 2016

By David Steele, President of Earthsave Canada Insidiously it creeps,[...]

Recent Posts

  • United Nations Environment Program: The World is In Grave Danger – But We Can Save It … and Thrive!
  • 2025 State of the Climate Report: A dire reality that we CAN turn around!
  • COP 30: The impacts of animal agriculture on the climate
  • Meat industry influence may lead to biased conclusions in nutrition studies

Follow us

If you found this helpful please consider donating.

Donate

Engage with us on facebook

Earthsave Canada

17 hours 4 minutes ago

:( :( :(

"Birds [who] spent more time at tourist sites were markedly more likely to die, while faster, farther-ranging birds lasted longer."

Ravens that take risks around humans are less likely to survive

A new study shows that fan-tailed ravens living near the Dead Sea are more likely to die when they spend time around humans.

2
View on Facebook
Share

Earthsave Canada

19 hours 11 minutes ago

"o bring some awareness to the state of our planet and its inhabitants, Joan Chan, a comic artist from Hong Kong, started a comic series

Artist Illustrates The Sad Reality Of Animal Cruelty And Shows How Factory Farming Harms Our Planet

Our ocean, land, and the array of species that call it home are succumbing to the poison of plastic. According to the United Nations, at least 800 species worldwide are affected by marine and land debris, and as much as 80 percent of that litter is plastic. It is estimated that up to 13 million metr

1
View on Facebook
Share

Earthsave Canada

21 hours 49 minutes ago

Biofuels, like animal agriculture, are utter insanity on any large scale. "Cheap biofuels are an illusion; someone, somewhere is paying the price through higher food

Why shipping’s cheapest alternative fuel could become its most expensive mistake

Cheap biofuels are an illusion: someone, somewhere is paying the price through higher food prices, deforested lands and disruptive climate impacts, writes Bryan Comer

View on Facebook
Share

© 2026 · Earthsave Canada.