• Why Plant-Based?
    • Overview
    • Sustainability
    • Better health
    • Compassion for animals
  • Resources
    • Virtual speaker series
    • Speakers program
    • Pamphlets
    • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Contact us
  • How to Help
    • Join us
    • Donate
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
Earthsave CanadaEarthsave Canada
  • Why Plant-Based?
    • Overview
    • Sustainability
    • Better health
    • Compassion for animals
  • Resources
    • Virtual speaker series
    • Speakers program
    • Pamphlets
    • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Contact us
  • How to Help
    • Join us
    • Donate
  • Subscribe to Newsletter

New science shows immense promise for rescuing ourselves

New science shows immense promise for rescuing ourselves

New science shows immense promise for rescuing ourselves

October 21, 2020 Posted by David Steele

We can slash both global warming and species extinctions by a simple change in our diets

A pair of very important papers has been published in the scientific literature over the last few weeks. Analyzing our effects on the environment, they note the terrible predicament that we are in but point to some very powerful solutions.

Most prominent among these studies was one published on October 14th in the prestigious scientific journal Nature. Titled Global Priorities for Ecosystem Restoration, the study finds that “rewilding” (that is, returning to nature) just 15% of current agricultural land in certain priority areas would yield enormous benefits. In relatively short order, it would sequester 30% of the CO2 that has been emitted by our burning of fossil fuels since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. That is, it would remove that CO2 from the atmosphere. Further, it would prevent some 60% of the extinctions now expected to occur over the next several decades.

Digging further into the paper, one learns that were we to restore 30% of agricultural land to the wild, we could sequester fully half of the carbon we have poured into the atmosphere and rescue another 10% of the species now expected to go extinct. Importantly, the authors found that this approach of rewilding our land is among the cheapest possible approaches there is for absorbing and storing CO2 from the atmosphere.

While the article is behind a paywall, Nature provides a very good summary of it in a news piece published in the same issue. The Guardian has a similarly good summary that you can read here. As quoted in the Guardian, one of the study’s authors notes:

 “If restoration is not properly planned it could lead to a risk to agriculture and the food sector, but if done properly it can increase agricultural productivity. We can produce enough food for the world and restore 55% of our current farmland, with sustainable intensification of farming.”

And it gets better.

A second paper, published in Science of the Total Environment, another well-respected journal, finds that – by far! – the most effective step we can take towards making rewilding happen is to change what we humans eat. The authors find that widespread adoption of vegan diets would be – again, by far – the most effective approach. This is not surprising, as countless previous studies have shown the same. And, reading the paper, it quickly becomes very clear that we can rewild much more than 30% of the world’s agricultural land if we do so.

All of this comes in the context of the most extreme loss of Amazon rainforest in history – a combined result of global warming and accelerating “slash and burn” agriculture to feed the world’s voracious appetite for meat. Imagine how much good we can do by abandoning that demand for meat and allowing the land to return to supporting what it once so well supported!

These papers make very clear how fundamentally important it is that we adopt a vegan diet. No, this alone will not solve everything: we must drastically reduce our use of fossil fuels as well. And we’ll need to make very good provisions for supporting the farmers who will lose their incomes as we make the change – but that is a small price to pay for the opportunity to rescue humanity and other species from extinction. And we can do it in very large measure by simply eliminating animal products from our diets.

The data is on our side. We can rescue ourselves.


Photo by Dave Herring on Unsplash

Share
Avatar photo

About David Steele

David is a molecular biologist retired in 2013 from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia. He has also held faculty positions at Cornell and Queen’s Universities. Dr. Steele is a frequent public speaker and a regular contributor to Earthsave Canada's publications. He is also an occasional contributor to various other publications.

You also might be interested in

Good vegan news from around the world!

Good vegan news from around the world!

Aug 17, 2020

Let’s face it - 2020 hasn’t exactly been the best year in recent history. Despite all the challenges we face, we must not be discouraged. The plant-based movement continues to grow and even offers hope for a better future.

Trying to stop climate change? Eating plant-based is more helpful than eating local

Trying to stop climate change? Eating plant-based is more helpful than eating local

May 18, 2020

While eating locally sourced food is still beneficial to the community, it’s important to remember that you aren’t significantly lowering your carbon footprint, or helping out the climate, without reducing or cutting out animal-based products from your diet.

The meat paradox: how animal lovers eat meat

The meat paradox: how animal lovers eat meat

Apr 5, 2021

People often demonstrate an understanding that eating animals is unethical and unsustainable, but choose to do so, giving various reasons to rationalize this decision. This is an example of cognitive dissonance, the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs. In many cases of those who eat meat, the conflicting beliefs are “I love and care for animals” and “I eat meat”. This version of cognitive dissonance is often referred to as the “meat paradox” – in short, I don’t want to harm animals, but I eat animals.

Donate

Recent Posts

  • 2025 State of the Climate Report: A dire reality that we CAN turn around!
  • COP 30: The impacts of animal agriculture on the climate
  • Meat industry influence may lead to biased conclusions in nutrition studies
  • How can we continue to honour our planet after Earth Month?

Follow us

Engage with us on facebook

Earthsave Canada

1 hour 49 minutes ago

Sadly, when it comes to plant-based foods, none is more damaging than coconut oil. It's even worse than palm oil.

Coconut oil, conservation and the conscientious consumer

Conscientious consumption of agricultural products is hindered by a lack of objective guidance and a distorted public discourse. Meijaard et al. use the environmental impacts of coconut production to illustrate the need for improved measures that facilitate fair and transparent comparisons among pro...

1
View on Facebook
Share
Earthsave Canada

Earthsave Canada

4 hours 34 minutes ago

Learn more and view the full slide show at www.instagram.com/p/DVjKkgzlHzn/

1
View on Facebook
Share
Earthsave Canada

Earthsave Canada

7 hours 25 minutes ago

Dairy is based on horrors. "Revelations of cruelty to dairy cows and their babies have emerged in investigation after investigation into dairy farms of all

3
View on Facebook
Share

© 2026 · Earthsave Canada.