• Why Plant-Based?
    • Overview
    • Sustainability
    • Better health
    • Compassion for animals
  • Resources
    • Virtual speaker series
    • Speakers program
    • Pamphlets
    • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Contact us
  • How to Help
    • Join us
    • Donate
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
Earthsave CanadaEarthsave Canada
  • Why Plant-Based?
    • Overview
    • Sustainability
    • Better health
    • Compassion for animals
  • Resources
    • Virtual speaker series
    • Speakers program
    • Pamphlets
    • Newsletters
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Contact us
  • How to Help
    • Join us
    • Donate
  • Subscribe to Newsletter

COVID-19: A disaster of our own making

COVID-19: A disaster of our own making

COVID-19: A disaster of our own making

April 8, 2020 Posted by Jen Flood

The devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be doubted. As the death toll rises, healthcare systems are on the verge of collapse, and the global economy is in crisis, governments and citizens around the globe have taken unprecedented steps to curb the spread of the illness.

As we cope with this crisis, it is important not to lose sight of one of its root causes: animal consumption.

COVID-19 is currently thought to have originated in a “wet market” in Asia, where farmed and exotic animals are tied up or stacked in cages.1 While the exact source may be uncertain, “there is no question that this virus moved into humans from an animal source”, according to Columbia University epidemiologist Ian Lipkin.2

The relationship between animal consumption and human illness is well established. As Dr. Michael Greger noted in a 2008 public lecture, a host of diseases such as measles, smallpox, whooping cough, typhoid fever, influenza, leprosy, and even the common cold resulted from the domestication of animals starting roughly 10,000 years ago.3 The evidence that this is so is very strong; seminars were held at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta over 30 years ago describing this reality to scientists.4

The more recent move to intensive farming has increased the risk of viruses being spread from animals to humans. A 2004 report by the World Health Organization, the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, and the World Organization for Animal Health stated:

Recent outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and avian influenza have shown once again the potential of microorganisms from animal reservoirs to adapt to human hosts. During the past decades, many previously unknown human infectious diseases have emerged from animal reservoirs, from agents such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Ebola virus, West Nile virus, Nipah virus and Hanta virus. In fact, more than three quarters of the human diseases that are new, emerging or re-emerging at the beginning of the 21st century are caused by pathogens originating from animals or from products of animal origin.

The report identified the “increasing demand for animal protein” as one of the primary risk factors for the emergence and spread of infectious diseases.5

In 2005, a United Nations task force warned that “[g]overnments, local authorities and international agencies need to take a greatly increased role in combating the role of factory-farming, commerce in live poultry, and wildlife markets which provide ideal conditions for the virus to spread and mutate into a more dangerous form”.6

Knowing the direct link between animal consumption and deadly viruses, we have the power to make choices to reduce the risks. China is considering a ban on eating and trading in wildlife,7 but singling out the specific cause of COVID-19 ignores the fact that the risks will continue to exist as long as we continue to engage in any kind of intensive animal farming. The next pandemic could easily originate in North America. 

The widespread adoption of a plant-based (vegan) diet could protect us against future pandemics. As we spend more time at home to avoid spreading the COVID-19 virus, this might be the perfect time to learn more about the many benefits of adopting a plant-based diet and to begin making a positive change. 

Dr. Greger points out in his lecture that pandemics are often discussed as if they were natural disasters, like hurricanes or earthquakes, over which we couldn’t possibly have control. “The reality, though, is that the next pandemic may be more of an unnatural disaster of our own making.”


[1] https://globalnews.ca/news/6682629/coronavirus-how-did-it-start/

[2] https://www.popsci.com/story/health/wuhan-coronavirus-china-wet-market-wild-animal/

[3] https://nutritionfacts.org/video/pandemics-history-prevention/

[4]  D. Steele, personal communication.

[5] https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/68899/WHO_CDS_CPE_ZFK_2004.9.pdf;jsessionid=48ED33C7618AC7729011C3B5C8FEB05C?sequence=1

[6] https://news.un.org/en/story/2005/10/157792-un-task-forces-battle-misconceptions-avian-flu-mount-indonesian-campaign.
Note also that the pandemic of 1918, now known to be bird flu, was highly contagious and killed 2.5% of those it infected. A modern strain of bird flu, H5N1, kills 50 percent of those it infects. Fortunately, human-to-human transmission of H5N1 is very limited, but research has shown that with only a few mutations, H5N1 could become airborne. If this were to occur, the ensuing pandemic could be far more devastating than COVID-19. 

[7] https://www.newscientist.com/article/2239559-coronavirus-china-wildlife-trade-ban-could-become-law-within-months/

Photo credit: CDC/ Alissa Eckert, MS; Dan Higgins, MAMS

Share
Avatar photo

About Jen Flood

Jen is a lawyer with a J.D. from UBC and a B.Sc. in physics from Queen's University. A vegan for over a decade and an avid cyclist, she joined Earthsave Canada in 2018.

You also might be interested in

Our Voice for Change

Animal dissection and championing against it

Apr 26, 2021

Our Voice for Change is championing and spreading awareness of animal-free dissection in BC Schools. They won $5000 in the Kelowna Sustainable Development Challenge to see their project tested in schools.

The meat paradox: how animal lovers eat meat

The meat paradox: how animal lovers eat meat

Apr 5, 2021

People often demonstrate an understanding that eating animals is unethical and unsustainable, but choose to do so, giving various reasons to rationalize this decision. This is an example of cognitive dissonance, the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs. In many cases of those who eat meat, the conflicting beliefs are “I love and care for animals” and “I eat meat”. This version of cognitive dissonance is often referred to as the “meat paradox” – in short, I don’t want to harm animals, but I eat animals.

A Critical Look at the WRI’s Recent GHG Source Assessment

A Critical Look at the WRI’s Recent GHG Source Assessment

Aug 28, 2026

Recently, the World Resources Institute (WRI) released a report which[...]

Donate

Recent Posts

  • A Critical Look at the WRI’s Recent GHG Source Assessment
  • Beyond the protein myths: why plant-based protein deserves a place on your plate
  • A Tale of Two Santa Martas
  • United Nations Environment Program: The World is In Grave Danger – But We Can Save It … and Thrive!

Follow us

Engage with us on facebook

Earthsave Canada

Earthsave Canada

13 hours 35 minutes ago

"De Waal argued that brain size is an insufficient proxy for intelligence, and that “the sentience and moral status of animals is a given,” a

1
View on Facebook
Share

Earthsave Canada

15 hours 42 minutes ago

Like animal agriculture, widespread use of biofuels is wreaking environmental destruction at enormous scales and stealing food from the poor.

The biofuel comeback: more fuel, less food, more land grabs

Biofuels are back, and so are their impacts: land grabbing, rights violations and climate breakdown. As Asian governments ramp up production, Trump uses tariff threats to push them to import US biofuels. Who profits, and who pays the price?

2
View on Facebook
Share
Earthsave Canada

Earthsave Canada

18 hours 27 minutes ago

"When Transport for London (TFL) in the UK removed junk food advertising from its network, weekly household purchases were estimated to fall by nearly seven

2
View on Facebook
Share

© 2026 · Earthsave Canada.